Friday, June 21, 2024
HomeLatest NewsBeef demand cut 800 million Amazon trees in six years.

Beef demand cut 800 million Amazon trees in six years.

- Advertisement -

800 million Amazon trees

An investigation by the Guardian reveals that cattle farming in Brazil is linked to the destruction of enormous forest areas.

According to a recent investigation, more than 800 million trees have been cut down in the Amazon rainforest in just six years to feed the world’s desire for Brazilian cattle. This has occurred despite severe warnings about the importance of the forest in tackling the climate catastrophe. The reason for the deforestation is to feed the world’s appetite for Brazilian beef 800 million Amazon trees.

A study driven by data and conducted by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ), the Guardian, Repórter Brasil, and Forbidden Stories reveals that cattle farming is linked to the systematic and extensive destruction of forests.

- Advertisement -

The Brazilian cattle business has made repeated commitments to steer clear of ranches connected to deforestation. On the other hand, the research reveals that 1.7 million hectares (4.2 million acres) of the Amazon rainforest were deforested near meat processing companies that exported beef worldwide.

800 million Amazon trees The investigation is a component of the Bruno and Dom project that Forbidden Stories is working on. It is a continuation of the work done by Bruno Pereira, an expert on Indigenous peoples, and Dom Phillips, a writer who has contributed significantly to the Guardian. The Amazon region claimed the lives of both guys one year ago 800 million Amazon trees.

Cattle ranching is the leading driver of deforestation in Brazil, and during the years 2019 to 2022, while Jair Bolsonaro was the country’s president, deforestation rates reached an all-time high. The new government led by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has committed to reducing the amount of destruction.

Researchers from the AidEnvironment consultancy utilized satellite images, cattle movement records, and other data to estimate the forest loss on thousands of farms close to over 20 slaughterhouses over the next six years, from 2017 to 2022. JBS, Marfrig, and Minerva are Brazil’s three largest beef operators and exporters, and they own all of the meat plants in the country.

- Advertisement -

800 million Amazon trees. The researchers looked at “buying zones” to determine the farms most likely supplied each slaughterhouse. These “buying zones” are places based on transport linkages and other characteristics, including the verification accomplished through interviews with plant representatives. The meat plants were involved in extensive exports, including those to the European Union, the United Kingdom, and China, which purchase the most Brazilian beef, 800 million Amazon trees.

800 million Amazon trees

The slaughterhouses in the states of Mato Grosso, Pará, and Rondônia were the primary focus of the investigation. These states are key frontiers of deforestation related to ranching. Because JBS, Marfrig, and Minerva all operate other operations in the Amazon region, it is quite likely that the entire amount for deforestation on farms that supply them is larger than the stated number 800 million Amazon trees.

The statements made by all three businesses indicate that they follow stringent compliance procedures openly and honestly to guarantee that they are achieving their sustainable objectives.

- Advertisement -

It appears that other companies, including Nestlé and the German meat business Tonnies, who had previously supplied both Lidl and Aldi, purchased meat from the plants that were the subject of this inquiry. On the list were dozens of wholesale buyers from various EU countries; some of these buyers feed the catering firms that serve as the primary food source for hospitals and schools 800 million Amazon trees.

Nestlé stated that two of the meatpackers were not now a part of its supply chain, and the company added: “We may scrutinize business relationships with our suppliers who are The individual or entity in question is either not inclined or cannot rectify any discrepancies in their adherence to our established guidelines.

According to Tonnies, the Brazilian companies in question process a large number of animals annually for export. It remains uncertain whether the company in question receives goods from deforestation-associated facilities. Tonnies also claimed that it was unclear whether the company was the recipient of products from animals. Lidl and Aldi have announced that they will discontinue selling Brazilian beef in 2021 or 2022, respectively 800 million Amazon trees.

There is a possibility that some of the beef sent to the EU violates the new legislation enacted to prevent deforestation in supply chains. Because of regulations that were passed in April, products that are imported into the EU cannot be associated with any act of deforestation that took place after the year 2020.

A senior director at the advocacy organization Mighty Earth, Alex Wijeratna, said: “The Amazon is very close to a tipping point.” These results are disturbing since the Amazon cannot afford to lose this number of trees… this has repercussions for the entire globe 800 million Amazon trees.

According to Delara Burkhardt, a Member of the European Parliament, the results indicate the significance of implementing more stringent regulations globally to address deforestation. Burkhardt emphasized that the devastation of the Amazon rainforest is not solely a matter concerning Brazil. Deforestation from the Amazon is a concern in various countries, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, and China, as they import such activities. It is recommended that consumer nations establish regulations to govern the supply chain to ensure that meat imported from other countries does not contribute to destroying natural habitats. The recently passed EU law addressing deforestation caused by imported products is expected to set a precedent for other major importers, including China 800 million Amazon trees.

According to the findings of Aidenvironment, thirteen of JBS’s meat processing plants were connected to ranches that had engaged in forest clearance, tree felling, or fire. There were six plants in the Marfrig garden, whereas the Minerva garden only had three 800 million Amazon trees.​

In 2022, the Bruno and Dom project conducted a precise analysis of the Amazon slaughterhouses owned by these companies. The analysis revealed that the processed cattle in Brazil were valued at over $5 billion (£4 billion). The industry’s economic value is predominantly realized outside of Brazil, specifically on dinner plates at Beijing and New York restaurants. Additionally, more value is added further along the complex supply chain. Throughout the last ten years, they have encountered persistent criticism regarding the rate of deforestation within their supply chains 800 million Amazon trees.

The cattle utilized by other companies’ operations have been traced to identical purchasing zones.

The study’s results indicate that over one hundred instances of forest loss occurred on farms that directly supplied corporate plants in 2017 when the entire beef supply chain was mappable.

2,000 hectares of forest were deforested on a single ranch from 2018 to 2021. The specific ranch under discussion is the So Pedro do Guaporé farm in Pontes e Lacerda, which is in Mato Grosso. JBS procured approximately 500 cattle from the ranch. However, the company reported encountering obstructions as its due diligence procedures revealed anomalies associated with the farm. The JBS meat plant has been exporting beef to the United Kingdom and other countries recently and processing cattle above 800 million Amazon trees.

According to Aidenvironment, the farm was connected to the indirect supply of over 18,000 animals throughout 2018 and 2019, distributed among the three meat packers. During the specified time frame, this was the prevailing circumstance. All three businesses have confirmed they are not receiving supplies from the property.

Over 250 cases of deforestation can be attributed to indirect suppliers. These suppliers are farms that raise or feed cattle and sell them to other ranches for slaughter. Certain farms serve as both direct providers and indirect suppliers 800 million Amazon trees.

For a considerable duration, meat corporations have asserted that the intricate nature of their supply chains makes it unfeasible to monitor the transfer of animals between ranches. According to critics, the above practise enables “cattle laundering,” wherein livestock from a deforested property deemed “dirty” is moved to a farm that is purportedly “clean” before being culled. This effectively masks the fact that the animals originated from a “dirty” ranch. The farm’s proprietor’s deforestation activities on other ranches notwithstanding, the property is deemed uncontaminated if it lacks a record of being penalized or reprimanded for deforestation.

A report on cattle laundering was produced in 2020 through a collaboration between TBIJ, Repórter Brasil, Dom Phillips, and the Guardian. Subsequently, the crew produced evidence indicating that cows originating from a farm subjected to sanctions for illegal deforestation had been transported on JBS trucks to a different farm deemed to comply with regulations. After the report’s publication, JBS decided to discontinue procurement from the owner of the two farms 800 million Amazon trees.

The study’s findings indicate that the proprietor currently services Marfrig, one of Brazil’s top three meat-packing companies. Despite being under sanctions, Estrela do Aripuan, one of his farms in Mato Grosso, remains a global beef supply chain constituent.

800 million Amazon trees. Based on the available records, approximately 500 animals were transported via the identical route investigated by TBIJ in 2020. The event took place during the period spanning from 2021 to 2022. The bovine animals eventually arrived at the second farm, Estrela do Sangue, deemed “clean” and had not incurred any environmental sanctions or penalties.

As per two distinct records, many animals were conveyed from Estrela do Sangue farm to the meat processing enterprise of Marfrig located in Tangará da Serra.

The TBIJ had conducted a separate investigation the previous year, establishing a connection between the Tangará da Serra plant and the invasion of the Menku Indigenous land in Brasnorte.

Also, Check Passengers and bystanders recount the harrowing experience of the train crash in India, where they were heard wailing for assistance.

According to reports, the facility has generated over one billion pounds in revenue since 2014 by selling beef products to markets in China, Germany, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom 800 million Amazon trees.

Marfrig verifies the status of cattle-supplying properties for each transaction it conducts. The company has confirmed the acquisition of cattle from the owner. The farm complied with Marfrig’s socio-environmental standards at the time of the slaughter. The property above was in an area devoid of deforestation, embargo, or forced labour. Additionally, it was not located within a conservation unit or on Indigenous grounds.

Marfrig issued a statement denouncing the practise known as “cattle laundering” and other irregularities. The organization audits all authorised vendors regularly to verify compliance with the compulsory socio-environmental criteria specified in the company’s latest policy 800 million Amazon trees.

Must CHeck Insider Secrets: Uncover the Best Discounts for Cheap Car Insurance for College Students!

Minerva has stated that they monitor the status of ranches to ensure that the cattle they acquire are not sourced from properties that have been illegally deforested, are subject to environmental restrictions, or are situated on Indigenous lands, traditional communities, or conservation units.

JBS raised concerns regarding the “buying zones” methodology employed in the study, noting that the estimation determines the potential upper limit of the purchase zone and not necessarily the actual purchase zone. Furthermore, the So Pedro do Guaporé farm was closed down promptly upon discovering any irregularities. Upon inquiry, the entity provided no precise information regarding the date.

- Advertisement -



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Mind-body wellness practices

Peer-to-Peer Lending Risks